Notice: We are migrating to a new server. The repository is in Read-Only mode. No new submissions can be accepted at this time.

  • UMIR Communities
    • UM Main
    • UM Bansalan
    • UM Digos
    • UM Guianga
    • UM Ilang-Tibungco
    • UM Panabo
    • UM Peñaplata
    • UM Tagum
  • Library Catalog
    • UM Main OPAC
    • UM Bansalan OPAC
    • UM Digos OPAC
    • UM Guianga OPAC
    • UM Ilang-Tibungco OPAC
    • UM Panabo OPAC
    • UM Peñapalata OPAC
    • UM Tagum OPAC
  • Login
 
View Item 
  •   UMIR Home
  • Laboratory Excercises
  • JAQ Community
  • jols
  • View Item
  •   UMIR Home
  • Laboratory Excercises
  • JAQ Community
  • jols
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Citation Tool

     
N/A

Stomach content analyses of lizard species from Mindanao island, Philippines

Thumbnail
View/Open
PU-J-MM-2023-CaminoF-FT
Date
2023-06
Author
Camino, Fritzie A.
Parba, Faith Jane
Tagoon, Marian Dara
Susulan, Treaseur B.
Vitor, Karyn Chrislene A.
Delima-Baron, Elsa May
Keywords
Diet
Feeding habits
Gonocephalus semperi
Gonocephalus sophiae
Tropidophorus misaminius
Citation Tool
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The Philippines is home to 209 lizard species (Uetz et al. 2021), of which 74% are endemic (Brown et al. 2013a). Knowledge of lizard species in the country has been focused mainlyon species accounts in various localities from Luzon (Diesmos et al. 2004, Devan-Song and Brown 2012, Siler et al. 2012, Brown et al. 2013b, Binaday et al. 2017, Cruz et al. 2018); Visayas (Denzer et al. 1994, Ferner et al. 2000, Bucol et al. 2011, Supsup et al. 2016, Obeña et al. 2021); and Mindanao (Delima et al. 2007, Nuñeza et al. 2010, Beukema 2011, Supsup et al. 2017, Venturina et al. 2020, Pitogo et al. 2021, Solania et al. 2021). Data on the diet of lizards from the country remain limited (Villadolid 1934, Reyes 1957, Auffenberg and Auffenberg 1988, Struck et al. 2002, Bucol et al. 2011, Law et al. 2018, Tabug et al. 2018). Information on diets from earlier reports used field observations (Bucol et al. 2011, Bennett 2014), claw material subjected to isotope analysis (Struck et al. 2002), individual tracing, and fecal sample examination (Law et al. 2018), in addition to inspection of stomach contents from captured wild specimens prior to preservation (Tabug et al. 2018) and stomach content analysis of preserved specimens (Villadolid 1934, Auffenberg and Auffenberg 1988).
URI
https://repository.umindanao.edu.ph/handle/123456789/2318
10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v22i1p63-68
Collections
  • jols [8]
Publisher
University of Sao Paolo

 

 

Browse

All of UMIRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister