Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPanolino, John Vincent D.
dc.contributor.authorSalgon, Scothy U.
dc.contributor.authorNieves, James A.
dc.contributor.authorBuenaventura, Viola P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T05:34:06Z
dc.date.available2021-06-08T05:34:06Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://103.123.43.41:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/75
dc.description.abstractPerhaps the most promising and understudied aspect of education is course assessment. Course assessment is important because it has a strong impact on learning and is an indicator of the quality of learning occurring in a class. Methods of assessment can be very different. However, the education literature is currently lacking empirical data about the general status of assessment practices or how those practices relate to student learning. This study lays the groundwork for future studies by providing a description of formative and summative assessment and learning strategies in various courses and suggesting some ways that assessment practices lead to different types of learning. In this study, instructors appear to follow effective practice by using multiple and alternative assessment methods, dispersing grades over time, and providing timely and frequent feedback to students. Student’s report focusing on relatively more complex learning strategies, such as elaboration and critical thinking over rehearsal. However, online instructors need to ensure that assessments are used strategically, and that feedback is productive and able to be acted upon by students.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCourse assessmenten_US
dc.titleCourse assessment survey: Basis for an action planen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record