Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVanScoy, Amy
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-22T04:18:34Z
dc.date.available2026-04-22T04:18:34Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.issn0024-2519
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.umindanao.edu.ph/handle/123456789/2265
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative secondary analysis reanalyzes data from a Q methodology study with 66 participants from a variety of library types in Slovenia, South Africa, and the United States. In the original Q methodology study, many participants ranked the statement "librarian as agent if change" as an important conceptualization of reference and information service (RIS). To elucidate and expand this finding, the qualitative data surrounding "librarian as agent of change" were analyzed thematically to understand how participants viewed, or did not view, RIS as making change. Results show that for librarians who perceive themselves as agents of change can be viewed on different level-individual, organizational, and societal. Results show that the pervasiveness of neutrality in RIS prevents some librarians from taking on a role supporting social change and advocacy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesvol. 93;no. 2
dc.subjectInformation servicesen_US
dc.subjectSocial justiceen_US
dc.title"We bring change to the people" or not: understanding librarians' views on reference and information service as social justice worken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record